Link: https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2017.0005
Author: Kimberly Jacob Arriola
Journal reference: Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 28 (2017): 30–45.
Summary: This normative article by Jacob Arriola takes two major theories and places them in the practical context of transplantation. The author motivates us to move beyond the documentation of ethnic disparities in transplantation but to get a deeper understanding of why these disparities exist. The role of racism is complex, and prevention or compensation interventions often do not address the problem's multiple and interconnected layers. The paper gives a detailed overview of the manifestation of racism, namely internalized, personally- mediated, and institutionalized racism, and describes how they can be recognized in the different levels of the social ecology of healthcare and transplantation. This paper concludes with clinical, research, and policy recommendations.
To do so, they made use of advanced google searches and interrupted time series analysis methodology. They collected data on “kidney trade,” “kidney sale,” “organ trafficking,” and “transplant tourism” reporting in 25 different countries with time points well before and after the 2008 promulgation of the DoI. They found that the DOI has a positive impact on the reporting of “organ trafficking” and “transplant tourism” but not on the reporting of “kidney sale” and “kidney trade.” They conclude to say that the increased reporting of “kidney sale” and “kidney trade” can be indicative of an impact of DOI on public awareness and increased reporting of the residual transplantation related crimes.
The authors then provide commentary, seemingly unrelated to the study conducted, and advocate for the legalization of organ trade. While this commentary is in direct conflict with the principles of the DoI, the results ofthe research could still provide valuable insight into the impact of the DoI.